It was suggested that could change the taking of certain materials body chemistry to veil the drug consumption. Although many products will have currently as a drug to screens in the head shops, High Times announcements, etc. expelled, they no respectable scientific basis. No screen is proved not yet efficiently to scientific studies. A row of upscale herbal teas and powder cleaners are promoted as an urine, without good medical reasons. While some users have announced noteworthy success with them, many do not have other. Independent experiments point to the fact, that it water thinner, which the screen resolution not that for the success accounts can become.
MANIPULATION
While urine thinner helps, it is not reliable 100%, above all for the everyday hard user. An other turn by some people is used, around the test, while falsifications substitute for clean urine on her own manipulations. Ethical questions aside, manipulation is a risk, there fields can be observed, or depart from before and does not cheat pull. For the adventurers in, the most reliable way, a good test result is to be guaranteed to clean urine which is available from different Internet supplier, determined except in that the sales have forbidden to substitute. Care, nevertheless, that labs check whether the temperature of the urine is on the right (approx. 90-97 ° F). Kits for the supply of clean, heated urine can be found on the Internet.
Another trick, around the test foil becomes on the test with adulterant spike. This beginning should be used only as the last means, there everybody adulterant can make chemically of rennet recognised if the trouble become to act itself, this. Negatives on the usually used EMIT lead a row of falsifications test, but not necessarily other tests. Everybody can be recognised under use of suitable lab procedures, but only if of rennet go from the way to search them. Common falsifications are detergents, bleaches, and vinegar, but most from them are light by smell, view control or easy chemical tests were found. In the case of disasters, which in the least provably household adulterant shown that in foiling uric tests for THC is eye drops (zB Visine ®) be effective. A huge number of commercial falsifications are at the market available on the Internet, in dispatch trade or head shops. Their formulations are to be held constantly changed step with the topical Detection technology. No. additive is reliable 100%, and always goes a considerable risk of the discovery. Many enterprises maintain drug tests to test for falsifications, but only a few have so strictly and thoroughly.
Many drug tests aid are with advertisement Back back-guarantees, if to test you positively. ATTENTION: no assurance guarantees good test results! Suppliers often exaggerate reliability of the product and ignore customer complaints.
Blood tests
In some situations, as accidents can be used blood tests. Blood tests are much better estimate than interference of the topical uric tests, because to recognise them the actual available being of THC in the system, however, they can be used, around do not measure psychoactive Metaboliten as well as. Blood tests of the rule positively on registration THC only for a few hours after the smoking, but heavy chronic smokers are able at a low level for a few days positively. The blood mirror of THC about 3-5 ng / ml are a sign of the prospective interference. If you marihuana uses during the last days, however, are not currently under the influence, you should pass yourselves on a blood test instead of an uric test, if generally possibly, because you rather turn too high to clean. On the other side if you lately smoked you can do better to take an uric sample, because these leave open at least the question whether you were under the influence at the time of the check. Also if urine do not become positive, to up to 3 or more hours after the smoking for occasional users.
Salivary tests
An increasingly popular, but still unproven technology platform contain tests saliva from the mouth deductions assumed. Saliva has the advantage, that less invasive than the urine or blood tests. Up to now tests have pointed, she comes as contradictory and unreliable if it around the disclosure of marihuana, but this has not stopped her application. The sensitivity of the salivary tests was not fixed unambiguously, but is able from few hours for one day or a bigger reach. While one could suppose that mouthwash is a helpful defence against salivary tests, this is not necessarily the case, there the check has to go to drug remains that shone from internal mouths of fabric belonging to body in the saliva are to be proved.
TESTS HAIR
Particularly "Big Brother"-ish-Technologie is the hair test which can recognise the drug consumption for months, or how long a hair grows since (skinhead's remark: The tests can be taken by any part of the body). Obviously has hair drug testing no influence on the present interference, but use only past, because it more than a few hours for drugs takes in the hair are trained. While hair of test very sensitively on cocaine, her delicacy is founded compared with pot less well. A hair test study proved, that 85% of the everyday smokers positively tested, while only 52% of the opportunity smokers (1-5 sometimes per week) have. To control not all employers, the hair tests for the use marihuana. Although the FDA and the scientific community retreat critically with hair tests which has not stopped the employer of his use. A row of shampoos are on the Internet, they pretend at the possession in passing hair tests to be helpful. At best these are able slightly helpfully by the removal of drug remains which are deposited outside in the hair by the exposition to smoke. Indeed, hair is tests, hence, should not be washed to the medicament remains which were trained inside in the hair by the follicles and to recognise. To avoid false alarms by passive smoking an exposition, are labs has to do to themselves the hair before the check to wash.
Juridical challenges
Potential employees have no legal entitlement to work preparatory drug screens challenge. Indeed, are workers who are already occupied, are able to do in the situation, her drug consumption employer test plans in certain situations, depending on labour legislations and local regulations challenge. Avoid signing nothing that your boss grants the right, arbitrarily you test, by information of your objections, you will refuse your right on a test to strengthen. If you think, you are tested wrongfully, you maybe have occasion for the complaint. To forbid San Francisco, Berkeley and some other countries,-the-job drug tests except in security-sensitive positions.
We regret, that to call these wrong technologies, but hold it for necessary to defend innocent people against unwarranted reproaches of the drug abuse. We ask you, this information uses to hide responsibly and not as a way irresponsible use of marihuana.
What's Wrong With DRUG uric tests ?
Data protection: Urine tests press for physical intimate private sphere. Measure Wirkstoff-Screening against the private sphere of the majority of the responsible employees, around a minority the supposed drug dependent, from which many, indeed, not with all drug dependent on site. Drug tests imposed government by 4. Amendment of the constitution, the immoderate search and seizure and required forbids "likely cause" for search warrants are limited. Indeed, is 4. Amendment of the rule not for tests, those of private employers.
Exactness: No test is infallible. Elevations about the drug test of rennet have remarkably a high mistake rate found to control of bad quality. A good rennet guarantees have added, around the danger of "False of positive minimise", even if mistake rates, suggested ones are meant only one of 10,000 on the expansion of the drug test for dozens of millions of employees like by the government that many employees are accused erroneously of the drug abuse.
The most frequent misunderstanding about drugs-uric tests is that it affects drugs erkennt-Arbeitnehmer, while have to do it really a proof about former drug consumption, to have no respect, recognises on-the-job-Leistung. Because of drug test very sensitively on marihuana, random check-like tests can promote use of other, more dangerous drugs like cocaine and opiates which is checked in 2-3 days or LSD, only seldom to wash. At the same time, most drug tests completely Except eight leave alcohol, the drug leading in the USA. Uric test is a TBUS inhärent faultily technology: it closes the most harmless out of vision the job marihuana use, because it then possibly striking on the job alcoholiism.
Effectiveness: Uric tests was never academically proved are as sure and effective for the improvement of the security in the job or the productiveness, and studies that the vast majority of the drug positives employee are as reliable as other (John Horgan, "test are negative," Scientific American, March, 1990; Dr. John Morgan, "threatened statistics and the undisturbed Worker" The drug Policy letter, May / June, 1989). Medical is seen the consensus by expert's opinions that drug tests of nature from an unreliable indicator are a nephritic function (Consensus report, Nationwide institutes on drug Abuse, journal of the American Medical association, 8th of November, 1985) for drugs. Dr. George Lundberg of the American Medical association "has them as a" Chemical of McCarthy era "(editorial staff, journal of the American Medical association, 5th of December, 1986).
Alternatives: The defects of the drug test by performance tests are avoided, that measures actual concentration and response time instead of chemical remains. To recognise computer video game tests, the interference by drugs, tiredness, stress, or the illness been developed, but not yet come to widespread application because of shyness of the government compared with chemical tests.
